A.)
Which artworks make an impact or impression on
me? Why?
The first artwork that makes an
impression on me was “The Mariana Piccola, Capri”. It was painted with oil by
Albert Bierstadt and was done on canvas in 1859. It made an impression on me
because the Marina Piccola Capri is a real location known for its beautiful
beaches, but in the painting the beach at first looks peaceful, but then you
see the pointed rock, that looks more like a ship and the rocks near the coast,
which could lead to destruction of ships. These images paired with the grey
clouds, gives you a feeling of hardship and work, rather than rest and
relaxation. It is just very different from what one thinks when they think of
Marina Piccola Capri.
The
next artwork was “Untitled” by ARTURO HERRERA, and it was done in 2006 in
graphite and coffee on paper. It makes an
impression because it is almost creepy and dark, even though light colors take
up a large portion. The more you look at it, the more you see hooves and legs
as if it is depicting deer, but the
black slashes throw you and how you feel off. It leaves and impression
because it could be happy, but because of the strategic position of the black,
it completely changes the meaning.
I connected with “Etude
Pour Le Pont De L’Europe”, which translates to The Europe Bridge, by Gustave
Caillebotte, done with oil and in the year 1876. This one caught my eye because
the grey tones and heavy coats, but sun shine depicted in the image reminded me
of Buffalo in the winter. We can have extremely cold temperature, yet the sun
still shines. Which in my head is what this image is showing, a mid-winter
scene.
The next one I connected with was “White
Barn” by Ralston Crawford, done in oil in 1936. This was chosen because it reminds
me of my great aunt and uncle’s dairy farm in Pennsylvania, a place I have many
fond memories of. Especially since when you go on the hill in the field that
pictures looks very similar to their house, only lacking the trees they have.
C.)
Which artworks would I like to know more about?
Why?
The artwork I
would like to know more about is “Temple to Albers”, by Richard Joseph
Anuszkiewicz, painted in acrylics in 1984. I want to know why he chose this particular
color scheme because although the picture doesn’t show it, in person it moves
as you do it. I want to know if that was intentional or if it was a happy
accident that that happened with the image. I just have questions.
“Traits,
Plans, Profondeur” by František Kupka, painted in oils, started in 1920 and
finished in 1922, was interesting to me. It is interesting because it looks
like many things, for instance a flower, or a peacock. My first though was a
stain glass window, but more options become open the more you look at it. So my
question is was there an original image in mind that was changed? Is that why it
can look like so many things or was that intentional?
I think we all can relate to “Etude Pour Le Pont De L’Europe.” I agree with you on its connection, just add two and a half feet of snow and it could be Buffalo! Before looking at "Traits, Plans, Profondeur" I too thought it was a stained glass type of painting. I can see a flower, a butterfly, a central staircase, and also of course just random shapes and colors. The blues are very bright and make the painting uplifting!
ReplyDelete